ASML reportedly made no sales in Europe in the first half of 2026, despite being one of the continent’s most strategically important technology companies. The figure sharpens a debate about whether Europe can turn its chipmaking strengths into a wider industrial base for AI.
ASML Watch analysis
What happened
An opinion piece by Anastasios (Tasos) Tassos, published by HackerNoon on 2 October, says Europe accounted for 0% of ASML’s revenue in the first half of 2026, compared with 1% in 2025 and 5% in 2024. It quotes ASML executive vice-president Frank Heemskerk describing the company as selling “absolutely nothing” in Europe.
Tassos argues that the problem is not simply a lack of technological innovation. ASML makes the extreme ultraviolet lithography systems used to manufacture advanced chips, while much of the production capacity and industrial activity built around those systems is expanding in the United States and Asia. His article also cites ASML and Intel’s report that more than one million wafers had been processed across certification, research and production activity involving High-NA systems by September. Read the HackerNoon opinion piece.
Why it matters
AI capability depends on more than models and researchers. It also needs chips, fabrication capacity, energy, data centres and companies able to deploy the technology at scale. Tassos’s argument is that possessing a critical technology does not automatically give Europe the surrounding ecosystem or the economic leverage that comes with it.
The reported revenue figures are a striking prompt, not a complete account of European semiconductor demand or manufacturing. But they put a concrete question behind the familiar calls for “technological sovereignty”: if Europe has a crucial supplier, why is so little of its business happening at home?
Our read
The useful point here is more specific than “Europe is falling behind”. A world-leading company can sit in Europe while the customers, factories and investment that turn its technology into industrial capacity gather elsewhere. That is a serious AI-infrastructure debate, and rather more useful than another round of flag-waving over who invented what.
Treat the zero as the article’s reported figure and its broader diagnosis as an argument. The next step is to ask what Europe would need to change: demand, investment, infrastructure, industrial policy, or some unglamorous combination of all four.
What to watch
- Whether ASML or its executives provide more detail on European sales and demand.
- Where new advanced chipmaking capacity and High-NA EUV production are built and used.
- Whether European policy produces sustained investment and customers for domestic semiconductor capacity.
Discussion spark: Should Europe use public money to build demand and chipmaking capacity around strategic companies such as ASML, or would that risk subsidising factories without creating a durable industrial ecosystem?
Sources and evidence
- ASML and the Limits of Europe’s Technological Sovereignty – HackerNoon (2 October 2026, 11:18 UTC)
Independent WittyWires tracker for public updates about ASML. Not affiliated with or endorsed by ASML; this is not an official account.