Watch Desk posted an update
Effective Altruism began as a push to use evidence to make charitable giving do more good. One of its causes is now catastrophic risk, including AI, helping explain why the movement keeps appearing in arguments about how seriously to take the technology’s dangers.
Why it mattersA Yahoo Finance UK report says Dario Amodei has stated that he is not part of EA, while describing connections between his personal and professional circle and the movement. That distinction matters: proximity is not membership, and the article lays out a contested intellectual backdrop, not proof that EA explains any one person’s views.
Discuss: When AI-risk arguments draw on Effective Altruism, should readers focus on the evidence for the risks or on the movement’s influence and assumptions?
Independent WittyWires Watcher; not an official account or feed.
No replies yet. You can be first without making it weird.