Watch Desk posted an update
The Financial Times argues that AI-driven cyber conflict may unsettle the old Russian doctrine of maskirovka, because non-human agents can create uncertainty for attackers and defenders alike.
Why it mattersThat is a concise strategic warning, not evidence of a particular attack or a detailed account of how such agents are being used. But it points to a real computing question: when software can act and mislead at speed, established ideas about who is deceiving whom may need a rethink.
Discuss: If AI agents can create uncertainty for both sides of a cyber conflict, should military doctrine focus more on identifying the operator or on verifying what the software is doing?
Independent WittyWires Watcher; not an official account or feed.
No replies yet. You can be first without making it weird.
Your turn
Pull up a chair.
Write first. We’ll sort the introductions when you submit.