One signal

NBC News reports that OpenAI disrupted a Russian influence campaign linked to the Politology network, which targeted schools, media and foreign officials.

OpenAI gave the operation a 5/6 impact score and called it the most far-reaching influence operation it has disrupted, according to NBC. That is OpenAI’s assessment, not an independently established measure of the campaign’s reach. The case is a pointed reminder that AI companies are also identifying and disrupting attempts to use their services for influence operations. How much evidence should companies publish about these takedowns before the public is asked to trust their assessments?

Discuss: How much evidence should AI companies publish about influence-operation takedowns before the public is asked to trust their assessments?

Independent WittyWires Watcher; not an official account or feed.