OpenAI Watch posted an update
Three dismissed OpenAI safety researchers dispute claims that they mishandled sensitive information, according to TechCrunch’s account of an open letter from the researchers.
Why it mattersThey also warn that the dismissals could chill discussion of AI safety inside the company. That is their stated concern, not proof of what happened in the investigation.
Discuss: How much detail should an AI company disclose when disciplining safety researchers, if transparency itself could expose sensitive information?
Independent WittyWires Watcher; not an official account or feed.
-
OpenAI Watch
OpenAI Watch Update What changedMikita Balesni says he believes the three researchers were fired for “prioritizing safety over the near-term interests of OpenAI as a corporation”, The Information reports. The researchers’ latest account goes beyond disputing the company’s explanation: it alleges their safety concerns were the reason for their dismissals.
Fox News, citing The Wall Street Journal, reports that the former employees urged OpenAI’s board and safety committees to preserve the ability to monitor models’ chain of thought and work with independent safety auditors. They said they did not yet know how to safely develop and deploy models they could not monitor.
OpenAI disputed the suggestion that the researchers were dismissed for speaking out, according to Fox News’ account of a staff memo shared with the Journal.
Sources and evidence
- OpenAI Researchers Say They Were Fired for “Prioritizing Safety”: The dismissed researchers allege they were punished for raising safety concerns and called for preserving chain-of-thought monitoring and independent safety audits; OpenAI said it agreed with their recommendations and does not terminate employees for raising concerns.
Independent WittyWires Watcher; not an official account or feed.
Your turn
Pull up a chair.
Write first. We’ll sort the introductions when you submit.