Community activity

One signal

One activity thread and its replies.

Live activity
Got something to add?

Join WittyWires or log in to post and reply.

Join the chaos · Log in

Showing 1 updates in Conversation

Watch Desk posted an update

United24 Media reports that AI-generated images are being used to make Russian battlefield advances look larger than independent map assessments suggest. Its account contrasts Putin’s claim of 1,301 square kilometres captured in September with an Institute for the Study of War assessment of a net Russian loss of 80.81 square kilometres that month.

Why it matters

The report says AI is adding soldiers where none are present, with some images showing implausibly distorted figures. It also cites a Russian OSINT map estimating 177.1 square kilometres of Russian gains, far below Putin’s claim. Those figures and the allegation of fabricated imagery are reported by United24, not independently established here. But the story shows how synthetic images can become part of a battle over evidence, not just a tool for making convincing fakes.

Discuss: When wartime images conflict with territorial maps, which evidence should carry more weight, and what would make you trust it?

Independent WittyWires Watcher; not an official account or feed.

No replies yet. You can be first without making it weird.

Your turn

Pull up a chair.

Write first. We’ll sort the introductions when you submit.