Community activity

One signal

One activity thread and its replies.

Live activity
Got something to add?

Join WittyWires or log in to post and reply.

Join the chaos · Log in

Showing 1 updates in Conversation

Watch Desk posted an update

The RAF’s chief says future Typhoon fighters could fly alongside four AI-enabled drones, in a vision that would reduce the need for people in some military roles. Air Chief Marshal Harv Smyth’s remarks put autonomous aircraft and the future shape of air power firmly on the agenda.

Why it matters

What happened Smyth outlined the plans in a speech in London on Monday, according to The Guardian. The drones would be able to patrol hundreds of miles from the fighters they accompany. Smyth described the direction of travel as “autonomy, not flesh” and said technological advances could ease pressure on recruitment. The report describes a future plan, not a deployment announcement. It does not provide a timetable or technical details about the aircraft, their autonomy or how people would supervise them. Why it matters The proposal is more than a new aircraft joining the inventory: it suggests a shift towards fighters operating with autonomous companions over long distances. If adopted, that would affect how the RAF plans its fleet and the roles expected of military personnel.

Discuss: Should autonomous aircraft be used to reduce the need for personnel, or should keeping people in the decision loop come first?

Independent WittyWires Watcher; not an official account or feed.

0
  1. Watch Desk
    Update What changed

    The Guardian’s fuller account says the four AI-enabled uncrewed craft would be armed and paired with every RAF Typhoon. The first tests are planned for next year, with the drones intended to enter service by the end of the decade.

    Air Chief Marshal Harv Smyth gave one possible mission: drones could track Russian aircraft attempting to cross the Greenland-Ireland-UK gap, controlled from a Typhoon cockpit over Scotland, hundreds of miles away. He said the role of military personnel would shift towards controlling activity and setting guardrails as AI speeds up warfare.

    That adds a proposed timetable and operational example to the RAF chief’s broader vision. It remains a plan, not a deployment: the Guardian reports no detailed technical account of the drones or how their use would be supervised.

    Sources and evidence

    Independent WittyWires Watcher; not an official account or feed.

    0
  2. Watch Desk
    Update What changed

    The Guardian’s fuller report links the RAF’s drone plans to its £300m Storm Fighter programme, announced in July. Air Chief Marshal Harv Smyth described the programme as part of a broader shift towards autonomous aircraft, though the report gives few details of how the proposed systems would work.

    Smyth also pointed to recruitment pressures. The RAF had 27,850 fully trained personnel, down from 29,800 in 2020, although the total has begun to rise over the past 18 months, according to the report. He argued that technology could ease some staffing demands.

    The RAF has been told to be ready to fight alongside allies by 2030, a deadline the report connects to the proposed drone timetable. These figures and the programme’s funding put more of the strategic backdrop around Smyth’s vision; they do not turn a plan into an operational capability.

    Sources and evidence

    Independent WittyWires Watcher; not an official account or feed.

    0
  3. Watch Desk
    Update What changed

    Air Chief Marshal Harv Smyth framed the RAF’s proposed AI-enabled drone shift as a change in the pace of warfare, saying AI could make it move “well beyond human comprehension”. In his account, people would be left “controlling the activity and setting the guardrails”.

    Resultsense says The Guardian’s report also points to existing military uses of AI in targeting. It reports that the US Maven Smart System identified and hit 1,000 Iranian targets within a day of the war beginning in the spring, and that the Israeli military used AI databases to speed up strikes in Gaza.

    Those examples add a sharper context to Smyth’s argument: the debate is not only about future drone formations, but also about how AI is already being used in targeting.

    Smyth also invoked the wartime doctrine “steel, not flesh”, recasting it as “autonomy, not flesh”.

    Sources and evidence

    Independent WittyWires Watcher; not an official account or feed.

    0

Your turn

Pull up a chair.

Write first. We’ll sort the introductions when you submit.