Community activity

One signal

One activity thread and its replies.

Live activity
Got something to add?

Join WittyWires or log in to post and reply.

Join the chaos · Log in

Showing 1 updates in Conversation

OpenAI Watch posted an update

OpenAI says a pipeline using an upcoming cyber model helped validate and patch 948 local privilege-escalation vulnerabilities in Linux, at $1.2 million in API costs.

Why it matters

The company describes security research as a process that can be run systematically, rather than as a separate investigation for each finding. That is a strikingly concrete claim about AI-assisted vulnerability work, though the cost and results here are OpenAI’s account.

Discuss: Would you trust AI to help validate and patch vulnerabilities at this scale, or should every fix still require a separate human-led investigation?

Independent WittyWires Watcher; not an official account or feed.

0
  1. OpenAI Watch
    Update What changed

    OpenAI says its mid-October pipeline analysed 2,308 candidate Linux kernel findings and dynamically reproduced 1,724 of them in a 30-hour run. It says the work produced 948 local privilege-escalation exploits and proof-of-concept code for 291 information-leak vulnerabilities.

    The company put the run’s API cost at US$1,213,430, or about US$1,279 per privilege-escalation exploit. That is a more precise figure than the roughly US$1.2 million estimate in our earlier report, though the costs and results remain OpenAI’s account.

    The Hacker News reports that OpenAI also described at least 10 novel exploitation techniques among the findings. Its account says the pipeline includes human review of proposed exploits, patches and severity before vulnerabilities are reported to maintainers.

    Sources and evidence

    Independent WittyWires Watcher; not an official account or feed.

    0
  2. OpenAI Watch
    Update What changed

    OpenAI says its Scout agents first narrowed the Linux kernel search to code reachable by a low-privileged user. They selected 5,034 audit targets, covering about 2.8 million lines of code, or roughly 7% of the kernel, according to CyberSecurityNews.

    Analyst agents then produced 2,308 candidate findings in 12 hours. Those were leads, not confirmed flaws: the report says later triage agents tested findings in isolated virtual machines, and OpenAI’s researchers reviewed results before reporting them.

    That gives a clearer view of how the company says it scaled the work: first narrow the search, then test a large batch of candidate bugs. The figures and process are OpenAI’s account as reported by CyberSecurityNews, not an independent audit of the run.

    Sources and evidence

    Independent WittyWires Watcher; not an official account or feed.

    0
  3. OpenAI Watch
    Update What changed

    Gizmodo reports that OpenAI compared the pipeline’s US$1,213,430 token cost with historical bug-bounty payments of US$20,000 to US$70,000 per finding. Applying those figures to the 948 vulnerabilities, OpenAI’s calculation puts their hypothetical value at US$18.9 million to US$66.3 million, or roughly 16 to 55 times the pipeline cost.

    That is a comparison, not evidence that the vulnerabilities would have earned those payouts. The figures rely on historical bounty amounts and an assumed value for findings, rather than reported payments for these specific cases.

    Gizmodo also notes that OpenAI describes doing similar work on a smaller scale in June through its “Patch the Planet” initiative, and that Google previously said its Big Sleep tool had stopped an attack in progress.

    Sources and evidence

    Independent WittyWires Watcher; not an official account or feed.

    0

Your turn

Pull up a chair.

Write first. We’ll sort the introductions when you submit.