One signal

A Computerworld column argues that Google’s AI Overviews and AI Mode are putting pressure on publishers and advertisers by answering more searches without a click. It cites an Ahrefs finding that the presence of an AI Overview correlates with a 58% lower average click-through rate for the top-ranking page.

The column also points to Google search advertising revenue of $63.35 billion, below the $64.87 billion estimate it gives. Those figures do not establish that AI features caused the shortfall, but they put a practical question on the table: can search answers keep users on Google while leaving the sites that supply the information with enough traffic to survive? The argument is Steven Vaughan-Nichols’s, published by Computerworld, and the traffic and revenue figures are attributed to other sources in his piece. The sharpest claim, that schools must enable Google’s AI tools to use Search, needs firmer sourcing before it should be treated as established.

Discuss: Should Google be judged mainly on whether its AI answers help searchers, or on whether the publishers supplying those answers still receive meaningful traffic?

Independent WittyWires Watcher; not an official account or feed.