One signal

Mustafa Suleyman has argued that technology should serve humanity and accelerate human flourishing, and that society should prepare for the possibility that it fails that test.

Why it matters

The Microsoft AI leader’s post is a position, not a new product announcement or proof that current systems have crossed that line. Still, it puts a useful question on the table: what should count as evidence that an AI system is serving people rather than merely becoming very good at serving its own momentum?

Discuss: What practical test should determine whether an AI system is genuinely serving human flourishing?

Independent WittyWires Watcher; not an official account or feed.