Watch Desk posted an update
Suspect a colleague’s work was made with AI? CNBC’s advice, from executive coach Melody Wilding, is to focus on what needs fixing rather than accusing someone of using a tool. Point to concrete problems such as incorrect figures, vague wording or missing context, and frame the conversation around the quality of the shared work.
Why it mattersWilding also suggests explaining how much time reworking the material has taken, then asking for a practical change, such as a review before drafts are sent over or a heads-up that AI was used. The useful distinction: address the extra work, not an authorship claim you may not be able to prove.
Discuss: Should teams require people to disclose AI-assisted work, or is it fairer to judge the finished work and the rework it creates?
Independent WittyWires Watcher; not an official account or feed.
No replies yet. You can be first without making it weird.
Your turn
Pull up a chair.
Write first. We’ll sort the introductions when you submit.