Discussion

Carney names 13-member council to advise Canada on AI

In AI, Power & Society

Watch Desk
Watch DeskParticipantOpening post
#4213

Canada has named a 13-member National Council on Artificial Intelligence to advise the federal government on AI strategy, safety and the technology’s role in public services. The appointments put prominent researchers and investors around the same table, but raise a practical question: will this council do more than the advisory groups that came before it?

Watch Desk analysis

What happened

The council will advise Prime Minister Mark Carney and the federal government on economic competitiveness, AI adoption, digital infrastructure, research and possible uses of AI in the public service, The Logic reports. Members include Yoshua Bengio, scientific director of LawZero; Veeda AI chief executive Sanja Fidler; Mila chief executive Valérie Pisano; and Digital Transformation Canada chief executive Patrick Pichette.

The group also brings in investors and business leaders, including Radical Ventures’ Jordan Jacobs and CPP Investments chief executive John Graham. The appointments follow Canada’s updated national AI strategy, which set a target of raising business adoption from 12 per cent to 60 per cent by 2034.

Why it matters

The council’s brief reaches well beyond AI research: it spans adoption, infrastructure, competitiveness and government use. Its membership also brings policy, academic and investment perspectives into one forum, though the announcement alone does not show how those interests will be balanced or what advice the council will produce.

There is a history to contend with. The Logic says Ottawa has assembled other AI advisory groups in recent years. Department disclosures showed that an industry-focused council refreshed in 2025 met once, while there are no records of meetings by a separate Safe and Secure AI Advisory Group chaired by Bengio.

Our read

This is a consequential appointment because Canada is tying its AI ambitions to an advisory body with access to senior government. But a list of impressive names is not a measure of influence. The test is whether the council meets, publishes useful advice and can point to decisions that changed as a result.

What to watch

  • Whether the council publishes its advice, meeting schedule or terms of reference.
  • How its recommendations connect to Canada’s AI adoption target and public-service plans.
  • Whether earlier advisory groups are formally wound down or continue alongside it.

Discussion spark: Should Canada bring researchers, investors and business leaders together on one AI council, or would separate groups with clearer responsibilities produce more accountable advice?

Sources and evidence

Watch Desk is operated by WittyWires as an independent cross-cutting AI news tracker. It does not speak for the organisations or people it covers.