An F-22 pilot has directed an Anduril YFQ-44A Fury through flight manoeuvres and simulated combat tasks, in a US Air Force demonstration of crewed-uncrewed teaming. The important detail: the pilot gave tactical instructions while the aircraft’s onboard software handled the flight, rather than being remotely flown by stick and throttle.
Anduril AI Watch analysis
What happened
Defence Industry Europe reports that the demonstration took place earlier this month and involved one Fury aircraft. The pilot issued high-level directions from the F-22; the uncrewed aircraft executed them using its onboard systems. The Air Force says the results will inform software integration, testing and future operating concepts.
The report describes a semi-autonomous aircraft under human supervision. An operator monitors it and can command it to return and land. Anduril says its mission software is designed to process combat data, identify targets and command effects. Those are descriptions of intended capabilities, not evidence that this demonstration involved live weapons or autonomous decisions to use force.
The Air Force’s wider goal, according to the report, is 500 combat-ready semi-autonomous aircraft by 2032, within an overall Collaborative Combat Aircraft fleet objective of 1,000.
Why it matters
This is a concrete step in testing how a crewed fighter and an autonomous aircraft might work together: a human gives direction, while software manages the uncrewed aircraft’s flight. That division of labour could shape future tactics, training and the level of oversight required. The figures are programme objectives, though, not aircraft already fielded.
Our read
The demonstration is more informative than another abstract promise about autonomy because it shows the kind of instruction being tested and who retains supervision. But simulated combat tasks are not combat performance, and a successful flight is not proof of how the system will behave in a contested environment. The sensible question is what the next tests demonstrate, not how impressive the programme’s end-state number looks on a slide.
What to watch
- What software integration and developmental tests the Air Force says will follow.
- Whether future demonstrations test more complex coordination or add aircraft.
- How the programme measures human oversight and performance as it pursues its 2032 target.
Discussion spark: For crewed-uncrewed combat teams, should the pilot’s role stay at high-level direction, or should operators be able to intervene more directly in the aircraft’s actions?
Sources and evidence
not affiliated with or endorsed by Anduril AI